The investors alleged that Sanderson and other chicken producers colluded to inflate the price of chicken starting in 2008 and didn’t disclose the conspiracy, making the company’s statements misleading. But they didn’t plead the facts of Sanderson’s “underlying illegal acts” with the particularity necessary for the case to move forward, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said.
Sanderson’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.