Investors in a proposed class suit accused the tobacco manufacturer of misleading them about the results of clinical studies conducted on its device and presented to the Food and Drug Administration. But some of the statements “were in fact true” when Philip Morris made them, while others were inactionable puffery, opinion, or forward-looking statements, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York said ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.