The software company’s investors properly alleged that it misrepresented its cloud segment revenue growth, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California said. Some of the challenged statements aren’t actionable, but others support a “narrow” fraud theory, allowing the case to proceed.
Oracle correctly identified some investor allegations added following the 2019 dismissal of an earlier complaint as “nothing more than puffery,” Judge Beth Labson ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.