The investors alleged that Mylan’s statements about the market and its income were misleading because the company was involved in antitrust conspiracies related to its EpiPen.
The EpiPen competition claims alleged Mylan’s negotiations with pharmacy benefit managers were monopolistic or injurious to competition. The investors asserted that Mylan misled them by failing to alert them that its place in the market was based on antitrust violations.
The claims fail because ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.