None of the challenged statements were false or misleading, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said Thursday. Nor did the investors adequately allege the level of intent or recklessness for securities fraud claims, the opinion said, affirming the proposed class action’s dismissal.
Investors said Gap’s repeated warnings about accurately gauging inventory were misleading because the problems had already occurred. But the risk disclosures were generic to the clothing industry, not specifically connected to the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.