A former
“The definition of insider trading is wholly judge-made: Every element of the crime and the scope of regulated individuals subject to it was divined by judges, not elected legislators,” Levoff’s lawyer
But prosecutors said in their own filing on Friday that the Supreme Court has held for decades that a corporate insider who trades on material nonpublic information violates federal securities laws. They said the allegations in the indictment against Levoff constituted “insider trading at its most basic” and called Levoff’s conduct particularly “flagrant” given his position as as senior lawyer responsible for Apple’s compliance with securities laws.
“In response, Levoff launches a Hail Mary pass, arguing that this court should dismiss the indictment because, according to him, the criminalization of insider trading is unconstitutional,” prosecutors said. “He is wrong, and his motion should be denied.”
Marino could not immediately be reached for comment on the government’s filing.
Levoff’s insider trading garnered him about $227,000 in profits, while allowing him to avoid $377,000 of losses, according to prosecutors. A Stanford Law grad who joined Apple in 2008, Levoff was fired from the company in September 2018.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Anthony Lin, Steve Stroth
© 2020 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.