Class representative Glen Littleton moved for a new trial, arguing Musk’s tweets were material and that the jury received confusing instructions. But the motion was “flawed,” and the jury’s February verdict was supported by substantial evidence with respect to materiality, the US District Court for the Northern District of California said Wednesday.
The court went to “great lengths to illustrate the difference” between falsity and materiality, Judge Edward M. Chen said. Furthermore, ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.