- BlackRock, Fidelity among firms approved for spot Bitcoin ETFs
- SEC chair continues to warn investors to be cautious
But the top Wall Street regulator, who’s seen as crypto’s no. 1 enemy, made a rare capitulation when he became the determining
His decision, which allowed companies including
“It should in no way signal the commission’s willingness to approve listing standards for crypto asset securities,” he said. “Nor does the approval signal anything about the commission’s views as to the status of other crypto assets under the federal securities laws or about the current state of non-compliance of certain crypto asset market participants with the federal securities laws.”
The SEC declined to comment beyond the Wednesday statement.
The lead-up to the SEC’s decision was marked by one headache after another. Late Tuesday, someone
In the end, Gensler, a Democrat, reluctantly voted with the SEC’s two Republican commissioners to green-light the products. The other two Democrats on the commission voted against the Bitcoin ETFs.
Before Wednesday’s decision, the SEC had denied every application for an ETF directly tracking Bitcoin, despite approving products backed by Bitcoin futures in 2021. The regulator cited concerns that the underlying market was more susceptible to fraud and manipulation.
But the tides shifted after an August ruling in which a federal court sided with crypto asset manager
Gensler pointed to the Grayscale decision as a determining factor for approving the latest round of filings, saying circumstances changed after that ruling. However, he described the approval as applying to a very narrow class of investment products and said it doesn’t change how the SEC views the rest of the industry.
“Investors should remain cautious about the myriad risks associated with bitcoin and products whose value is tied to crypto,” he said in his statement.
Hands Tied
Gensler’s message arrived loud and clear.
There should be no doubts that the majority of the commission remains hostile to digital assets and that Gensler views Bitcoin as a speculative, volatile asset often used for illegal activities, said
“By stressing that the commission’s hands were essentially tied, I think he is in effect washing his hands if there is any collapse on the price” of Bitcoin, Fischer said.
“I really believe that the agency’s going to be reluctant to expand its analysis beyond Bitcoin,” Garrison said.
Read more:
Ark Investment Management’s
“He just denigrated the whole crypto space,” Wood said in a Bloomberg Radio interview aired on X, the social network formerly known as Twitter. “I couldn’t believe it.”
Over the last year, the agency has brought one enforcement action after another against crypto companies — suing them for everything from outright fraud to registration violations. The industry has pushed back, claiming the agency is regulating by enforcement when it should be writing rules to clarify how securities laws apply to digital assets.
Despite the contentious relationship, Gensler may have just handed the sector one of its biggest wins to date — just one he won’t be celebrating.
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Stephanie Stoughton, Dave Liedtka
© 2024 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.