- Bank appeals April decision; says law firm isn’t independent
- Credit Suisse is looking to move beyond 2019 spying scandal
The bank is appealing an April decision by Switzerland’s Federal Administrative Court that tossed out claims that
“Quinn Emanuel does not meet the legal requirement of independence because it is engaged in numerous legal proceedings against the bank,” Zurich-based Credit Suisse said in a statement Friday. The bank said it will continue to cooperate with the probe pending the outcome of its appeal.
Switzerland’s second biggest bank continues to be dogged by the scandal that erupted last year after it spied on star banker
Finma said in a statement that in general it “attaches great importance to the question of independence when selecting” investigators.
A spokesman for Quinn Emanuel declined to comment.
Credit Suisse had argued that
But the Federal Administrative Court in April dismissed the bank’s argument, pointing out that Werlen tried to distance himself from his firm in several ways, including communicating with Credit Suisse by hand-delivered letters instead of using the law firm’s email network.
(Adds Finma comment in fifth paragraph)
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Ross Larsen
© 2020 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.