The San Jose-based networking giant’s shareholders didn’t adequately plead that the Cisco board of directors “wrongly refused” their pre-suit demand that the company add Black directors to live up to its public statements on diversity, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California said.
The shareholder derivative complaint—filed in September 2020, seven weeks after the pension fund behind the suit ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.