The plaintiffs in the case, originally filed as a class action, failed to show that they relied on the company’s allegedly erroneous statements in buying Best Buy stock, the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota said March 8.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in April 2016 vacated class certification, finding Best Buy rebutted the plaintiffs’ “fraud-on-the-market” theory by showing the alleged misrepresentation had no effect on share price.
To proceed with their claims, the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.