Unilever consumers who suffered no adverse reactions from a shampoo failed to show compensable harm, a federal court in Illinois said Wednesday, dismissing a proposed class suit alleging the company deceptively portrayed the product made with a formaldehyde-related preservative as safe.
Emily Castillo and others alleged
The consumers didn’t allege they were allergic to the preservative or had adverse reactions themselves, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois said. ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.