Sex Enhancement Supplement Class Suit Goes Limp

June 14, 2016, 8:48 PM UTC

Consumers alleging that the IntenseX supplement didn’t actually provide the advertised sexual enhancement benefits may not proceed as a certified class, the Southern District of California held (Sandoval v. PharmaCare US Inc., S.D. Cal., 15-738, 6/10/16).

The lead plaintiffs failed to prove that reliance on the advertised effects of IntenseX was common to all members of the would-be class, Judge Marilyn L. Huff wrote June 10 for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California.

John Sandoval and Jonathan Kanfer filed putative class claims against PharmaCare US Inc., alleging the supplement maker falsely advertised the ...

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

See Breaking News in Context

Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.