Reasonable consumers have no reason to know that the label “refers to an increased amount of scent instead of a greater quantity of detergent,” the complaint filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California said. Lead plaintiff Nicole Costa said the detergent’s packaging “does not clarify or explain this claim.”
Procter & Gamble didn’t immediately respond to a ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.