Oreo maker
Charles Harris and others alleged the representation was misleading because the cocoa was refined through an alkalizing process that diminishes its quality and taste. Unalkalized cocoa is commercially available and has certain health benefits, they said.
But the plaintiffs don’t dispute that the challenged products are in fact made with cocoa, “which is fatal to their case,” Judge Edward R. Korman of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.