John Newton and others alleged the “natural” wording is misleading because Daisy sour cream is made with cream from cows whose feed might contain genetically modified organisms.
They failed to state a plausible claim of deception, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York said.
Their allegation that the GMO feed makes Daisy sour cream “genetically modified” and therefore “unnatural” is speculative, inconsistent with federal law, and “fails to comport with reality,” the court ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.