A sports netting manufacturer avoided having to face reinstated claims by a Pittsburgh Pirates fan hit by a foul ball that deflected off its netting, after the Pennsylvania high court declined to review a state appeals court ruling.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday let stand a ruling that the trial court wasn’t obliged to give a jury instruction that Promats Athletics LLC had a heightened duty of care to plaintiff Wendy Camlin, compared to the Pittsburgh Pirates organization and the Sports and Exhibition Authority of Pittsburgh and Allegheny County, who both settled before trial.
Camlin unsuccessfully argued that Promats ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.