The US District Court for the District of Kansas on Nov. 1 rejectedLyft’s argument it’s just a service matching riders and drivers and can’t be sued for product liability. Under the facts alleged, “Lyft offers a ride-sharing service, but it provides its own proprietary product—the Lyft application—that its drivers and passengers are required to use in order to provide or receive the service ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
