Zaida Hicks and 13 other named plaintiffs lack standing to sue because they didn’t offer enough facts to allow the inference that the mascaras they bought contained PFAS, or that there was a material risk that they did, a New York federal court said.
The suit is part of a growing number that allege companies failed to disclose the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in cosmetics and other consumer products.
PFAS are used in ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.