The agreement purports to require Garrett to reimburse Honeywell for 90% of Honeywell’s legacy asbestos liability, according to a complaint filed Wednesday in a New York state trial court.
But the agreement also gives Honeywell a veto over Garrett’s key corporate decision-making for three decades, making Garrett “Honeywell’s asbestos piggybank,” the complaint alleged. The agreement is unlawful and so one-sided as to be manifestly ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.