Zofran was approved to treat nausea associated with chemotherapy. The families allege the drug was illegally promoted to treat pregnancy-related sickness. They allege Zofran caused heart defects and other problems in their children and that GSK didn’t adequately warn about its use during pregnancy.
Their suits were thrown out in June, when the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts said impossibility preemption bars the claims because ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.