Arguments in two tobacco cases before the Florida Supreme Court Dec. 4 focused on a threshold issue for suing as an “Engle-progeny” plaintiff and on the availability of punitive damages when such a plaintiff doesn’t prove intentional torts (R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Ciccone, Fla., SC13-2415, oral argument 12/4/14; Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Fla., SC13-139, oral argument 12/4/14).
The unsettled issues potentially apply to many cases in the 8,000-case-strong litigation that arose following decertification of a smokers’ class in Engle v. Liggett Group Inc., 945 So. 2d 1246, Fla..
A ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.