Consumers alleging
Dunkin’ argued that it doesn’t actually operate in California because all the stores are franchisees and the consumers didn’t “make any showing beyond a few sparse allegations” that the US District Court for the Northern District of California had personal jurisdiction over the company, Judge Susan Illston said.
Illston noted that even if the court had jurisdiction, the consumers failed to allege they are considered disabled by the Americans with ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.