Lead plaintiffs Abigail Esquibel and others alleged that independent third-party testing revealed high levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in Tom’s Wicked Fresh! Mouthwash. But they lack standing to sue because they didn’t show they were financially harmed, the US District Court for the Southern District of New York said.
- The plaintiffs’ allegations aren’t enough to support a plausible inference that the bottles they bought were tainted, and the mere risk that ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.