Vegans who say
Phillip Williams and others allege that despite Burger King’s representations that it uses an “Impossible burger,” a trademarked meat-free and vegan-meat alternative, their strict vegan principles were compromised by the use of a common grill that tainted their food with meat residue.
“Impossible” meat, owned independently from Burger King, is one of the most popular meat alternatives in the country, the lawsuit says.
But the customers’ contract-based and ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.