Verizon isn’t liable for employee Brandon Kostick’s alleged actions because the conduct isn’t “of a kind and nature” that he was employed to perform, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania said July 18.
“No conceivable explanation” exists as to how the employee’s conduct would serve Verizon’s business, the court said.
The court dismissed numerous claims by Kristal Bissett including unlawful computer duplication, unlawful use of a computer, unlawful transmission ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.