- Ernst & Young 2021 audit called Twitter security appropriate
- Audit didn’t flag dire gaps exposed by ex-cyber chief ‘Mudge’
A previously undisclosed government-ordered audit of
The 2021 external audit, obtained by Bloomberg News in response to a public records request, concluded that the company had appropriate safeguards. Months later, the company’s cybersecurity chief had left and alleged that Twitter’s practices were marred by “egregious deficiencies.”
It’s not the first time that an FTC-ordered audit has neglected to uncover security weaknesses. FTC-ordered audits of
Twitter’s practices are in the spotlight again amid an exodus of its security team and the FTC expressing concern about the company under new owner
Ernst & Young declined to comment on the audits, citing client confidentiality. Twitter didn’t respond to requests for comment for this story. It previously denied Zatko’s allegations, saying they are are “riddled with inconsistencies and inaccuracies,” and that access to data is controlled by monitoring systems and background checks.
Even though Musk took the company private last month, Twitter is still subject to FTC oversight under the consent order through at least 2042, meaning that any changes to the company’s privacy and data policies and new product offerings are subject to scrutiny by the agency.
The FTC said in a statement Thursday that it’s tracking recent developments at Twitter with “deep concern.”
“No CEO or company is above the law, and companies must follow our consent decrees,” FTC spokesperson Douglas Farrar said. “Our revised consent order gives us new tools to ensure compliance, and we are prepared to use them.”
The FTC has been scrutinizing Twitter’s privacy and data-security compliance for more than a decade, requiring it to submit to independent audits every other year. The 2011 consent order resolved allegations that Twitter had failed to adequately protect user data in a 2009 hack of the social media platform that allowed intruders to send out phony messages from any user account.
Twitter in May paid a $150 million penaltyfor violating the order by misusing email addresses provided for security purposes. The agency said Twitter used the emails for targeted advertising from 2013 to 2019.
Known by his hacker name “Mudge,” Zatko joined Twitter in late 2020 at the behest of former Chief Executive Officer
In Senate testimony in September, Zatko
“The FTC is a little over their head,” Zatko told senators. “Foreign regulators were much more feared than the FTC.” He said the security lapses were so grave that they threatened national security and were dangerous for users.
Recent Actions
The agency, in a statement to Bloomberg News, said: “It’s clear from recent enforcement actions that the FTC is not afraid to take companies and their executives to court to protect the public and vindicate our orders.”
Much of the 2021 audit, which covers the period from Sept. 13, 2019 to Sept. 12, 2021 is redacted. A representative for Zatko said he couldn’t comment on whether he was among those interviewed as part of the audit because he is legally barred from discussing his whistleblower complaint except with Congress or other federal agencies that received it.
--With assistance from
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Jon Morgan
© 2022 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
