Ugg brand owner
Deckers argues injecting claims that consumers demand and embrace cheaper copycats invites the jury to decide the infringement issue based on social sentiment rather than the objective visual comparison the law requires.
But Quince says evidence of other Ugg “dupes” supports its argument that the design is functional and therefore not eligible for design patent protection, which only covers ornamental designs.
The parties are set to ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.