Noom Inc. dodged claims that it illegally tracked visitors to its website, with a federal judge in California ruling that such tracking doesn’t amount to “eavesdropping.”
U.S. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler ruled Thursday that the proposed class action from Noom website visitors, who likened the tracking to wiretapping, failed to show that their communications were intercepted by FullStory Inc., a website analytics firm.
Beeler found that unlike other cases where third parties such as
“It is not a third-party eavesdropper,” Beeler wrote ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.