A Delaware judge ruled against the pharmaceutical giant eight months after a trial of claims that it engaged in wide-ranging breaches of its agreement with former Auris shareholders by failing to pursue regulatory approvals for two projects with blockbuster potential, the iPlatform and the Monarch.
More than $2 billion in additional payments hinged on the approvals. The allegations echoed a recurring theme in Delaware’s Chancery Court, the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.