In the absence of expert testimony, a product recall letter issued by a medical device manufacturer does not establish the device was defective or unreasonably dangerous, a federal court in Alabama ruled May 13 in (Hughes v. Stryker Sales Corp.).
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ruled that without expert testimony, plaintiff Judith Hughes could not meet her initial burden of showing that the Trident Hemispherical Acetabular Shell manufactured and distributed by defendants Stryker Sales Corp. and Howmedica Osteonics Corp. (collectively Stryker), was defective.
Expert testimony also was required to establish a causal connection ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.