A California woman’s claims that the antibiotic Levaquin caused a toxic skin reaction shouldn’t have been dismissed as time-barred because knowledge of causation can’t be imputed to a comatose patient, the Ninth Circuit said in an unpublished opinion (Holmes v. Johnson & Johnson, 9th Cir., 13-55821, unpublished 6/30/15).
The district court erred in concluding that plaintiff Gail Holmes, who was in a coma for 15 days, had filed her suit outside the two-year limitations period, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said June 30.
In finding the suit untimely, the trial court relied on ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.