“Every month of delayed generic competition has allowed Forest and its successors to unlawfully maintain many millions of dollars in monopoly profits” through “willful exclusionary conduct,” rather than a “superior product, business acumen, or historical accident,” the complaint says.
The lawsuit accuses Forest of lobbing patent infringement claims at competitors proposing Bystolic generics, then resolving those cases by offering them ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.