- Justice Department files complaint in California federal court
- Companies say they will ‘vigorously defend’ deal in litigation
The US Justice Department sued to block
In a complaint filed Thursday in federal court in California, the US said the deal would consolidate the sector from three major players — HPE, Juniper and
The antitrust suit marks the first brought by the Justice Department under President
The proposed transaction, “if consummated, would eliminate head-to-head competition that has lowered prices and driven investment in network management software, and it would decrease pressure on HPE to discount and innovate in the future,” the Justice Department said in its complaint.
WATCH: HPE CEO Antonio Neri says the Justice Department’s reasoning to block the $14 billion Juniper deal is “flawed,” vowing to fight the case “vigorously.” Source: Bloomberg
Shares of HPE and Juniper each fell 2% respectively.
“We will vigorously defend against the Department of Justice’s overreaching interpretation of antitrust laws and will demonstrate how this transaction will provide customers with greater innovation and choice,” the companies said. “This transaction brings together two complementary networking offerings and will create a networking player with the scope and scale to more effectively compete with global incumbents.”
HPE and Juniper, like bigger rival Cisco, make networking devices such as routers and switches. Networking is the technology that directs the flow of information between devices and across the internet. Both companies supply gear used by businesses and other organizations to provide wireless internet access to people inside their facilities.
Rising competition from Juniper forced HPE to discount its products and develop new features in a campaign to “Beat Mist,” the name of Juniper’s competing product, the Justice Department wrote. Salespeople were trained to better compete with Juniper, and competitive intelligence about Juniper continued to be shared within HPE even after the acquisition was announced, according to the complaint.
HPE senior executives tracked Juniper’s growth in recent years, with one noting the expansion is “concerning for me,” the Justice Department wrote. In 2021, another sales leader encouraged his teams to “KILL MIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
Many large customers “believe Cisco’s products compare unfavorably to HPE’s and Juniper’s on price, features, and reliability,” the Justice Department wrote. “Those customers benefit from having Juniper as a credible alternative to Cisco and HPE in the market. If HPE successfully acquired Juniper, the acquisition would leave them with fewer credible choices.”
Since Hewlett-Packard was split into two companies in 2015, HPE has focused on business-oriented products and services such as selling high-powered computing, networking, and cloud services.
“We believe there is no case here,” HPE Chief Executive Officer
Read more:
Executives from HPE and Juniper
In the EU, the deal secured unconditional approval after regulators found that it would not raise competition concerns in any of the markets examined on the bloc. The move was soon followed by a green light from the UK Competition and Markets Authority.
(Adds CEO comments in 13th paragraph.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Jeffrey
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.