Although Nevada’s justices previously subjected mergers involving “interested parties” on a corporate board to the investor-friendly “inherent fairness” standard, that ruling was overturned by a law imposing the board-friendly “business judgment” rule on most deals, a divided state supreme court said.
The statute “plainly requires the plaintiff to both rebut the business judgment ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.