- CEO was accused of ignoring staff warnings of possible harm
- Judge’s ruling marks second time Zuckerberg avoids liability
A federal judge again rejected a bid to hold
US District Judge
Lawsuits filed on behalf of young people have alleged that Zuckerberg was repeatedly warned by Meta employees that Instagram and Facebook weren’t safe for children but ignored the findings and chose not to share them publicly.
Holding CEOs of large companies personally responsible for wrongdoing is generally difficult because of a corporate law tradition of shielding executives from liability.
“While possible that discovery may reveal a more active participation and direction by Zuckerberg in Meta’s alleged fraudulent concealment, the allegations before the court are insufficient to meet the standard for corporate-officer liability,” Rogers said in her order.
The cases naming Zuckerberg are a small subset of a collection of more than 1,000 suits in state and federal courts in California by families and public school districts against Meta along with
The case is In Re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation, 22-md-03047, US District Court, Northern District of California (Oakland).
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Blumberg, Steve Stroth
© 2024 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.