The proposed settlement, which needs court approval, will provide consumers who participated in the lawsuit with “approximately double their out-of-pocket damages,” lawyers for plaintiffs said in a court filing Wednesday in federal court in Phoenix.
The lawsuit accused Walgreens of being “willfully blind” to fraud at Theranos and entering into a partnership with the startup even though it had good reason to suspect its finger-prick testing technology didn’t really work.
Lawyers for the company and consumers filed a notice of a
According to the filing, lawyers for the consumers said they believed the evidence would support a finding against Walgreens but acknowledged the judge had said the company had “potent” defense arguments, including that it was also defrauded by Theranos.
According to the filing, a separate deal with Balwani will allow another $1.3 million to be paid to the settlement fund, but that “an agreement with Ms. Holmes, unfortunately, could not be reached.”
Read More:
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Anthony Lin
© 2023 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.