Unum overlooked “the utter lack of evidence” that the insured individual’s employer played any role in obtaining, negotiating, administering, or securing Jeffrey K. Shrago’s policy, and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act doesn’t preempt his claims, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland said Wednesday.
Shrago, who works in commercial real estate, bought individual disability insurance through Unum in 1994.
He and two of his colleagues, ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
