The plaintiff, referred to as Ryan S., again failed to tie United’s alleged practices to an injury that he suffered, which means he lacks standing to press his claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, Judge James V. Selna of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California said in a Dec. 4 order.
Ryan S. accused United of a number of impermissible practices related to its ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
