An Uber passenger injured in a crash is challenging online companies’ ability to force customers into arbitration through terms and conditions that consumers likely haven’t read in a case before the Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court Friday.
William Good sued Uber in 2022, seeking more than $60 million in damages after his driver’s collision on the way home from work left him permanently quadriplegic. But as an Uber customer, Good had checked a box indicating he agreed to the company’s Terms of Use, which contained an agreement that any disputes would be resolved through arbitration.
The Supreme Judicial Court will hear ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.