Judge Ethan P. Schulman of the San Francisco Superior Court, in a ruling late Thursday, rejected Uber’s arguments that it doesn’t have a legal duty to protect its passengers, finding that the app is a common carrier akin to a passenger train or taxi cab service.
Under California law, a common carrier must provide the “utmost care and diligence” to its passengers, the judge said.
The first of four bellwether jury trials is set for Sept. 8.
The case is a consolidated state court proceeding containing over 500 individual lawsuits from California passengers who were assaulted by their Uber drivers. It parallels federal multidistrict litigation in the US District Court for the Northern District of California that contains thousands of similar assault cases from across the country.
The case is In re Uber Rideshare Cases, Cal. Super. Ct., No. CJC-21-005188, 7/31/25.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.