These errors included relying on circuit precedent involving summary judgment to reject Matilde Santana’s reprisal allegations at the motion-to-dismiss stage, the three-judge panel said in an unpublished opinion.
Santana “unquestionably engaged in protected activity” under anti-retaliation law by repeatedly complaining about her supervisor’s sexual harassment, including internally and through her lawyer, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit said. And Santana’s suit linked her protected activity to the subsequent ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.