The D.C. government failed to shake a lawsuit that would allow a Virginia-licensed therapist to provide remote counseling services to its residents, despite lacking a D.C. license, because she properly alleged its licensing scheme is unconstitutional, a federal court said.
D.C.'s requirement that therapists be licensed regulates counseling, which is speech, not conduct, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia said Monday in denying a motion to dismiss Elizabeth Brokamp’s suit.
The fact that the licensing requirement is a professional regulation makes no difference, the court said in a minute order posted on its docket.
The licensing requirement ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.