A suit alleging
The lower court failed to analyze whether the label was ambiguous, which would require a reasonable consumer to account for additional information to interpret the label’s claim, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said. It reversed dismissal of the suit and remanded for further proceedings.
Plaintiff Alexander Panelli sued Target after buying the sheets as advertised. He said that the bedding was rougher than he expected, that independent testing showed the sheets had a thread ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.