The district court determined that the retail chain’s overtime practices conflicted with California law and rejected its motion for judgment on the pleadings. But Target actually complied with the state overtime requirement and is entitled to an early win, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said in an unpublished opinion.
- The workers argued that Target didn’t properly calculate their regular rate of pay for overtime purposes and ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.