Four former Swiss Re employees sufficiently alleged that their ex-employer’s investment process and plan selection was imprudent and that it misused their forfeiture funds, Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr. said. The US District Court for the Southern District of New York denied Swiss Re’s motion to dismiss without prejudice.
“Plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged facts that demonstrate defendants have breached their fiduciary duties by making imprudent investment decisions,” Carter said.
The ex-workers allege in a ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
