A jury must decide whether the company’s explanation—that it terminated George Cable because he violated its policy by confronting a customer who allegedly tried to steal the baristas’ tip jar—was pretextual, the US District Court for the Central District of California said. The evidence would support a finding that the tip jar incident was used as a reason to fire Cable, the court said.
The ruling also illustrates that an ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.