The named plaintiffs—two California residents who leased Sprint phones—said in the Thursday complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California that the company had a duty to clearly disclose the nature of the contract’s provisions.
The company’s “Flex Lease Agreement,” also known as the “Sprint Flex program,” advertises options for customers to obtain phones for a low monthly cost through monthly installments ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
