Skullcandy Inc. failed to convince a federal California court to dismiss wiretapping and eavesdropping claims from a state invasion of privacy suit over its use of online trackers on its e-commerce website.
Plaintiff Julie Jones sufficiently alleged cognizable harm, as well as claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act, and the US District Court for the Southern District of California is persuaded it has jurisdiction over Skullcandy.
Jones alleged that Skullcandy used tools from Meta Platforms and Google to collect browser and purchase data. Besides the Meta Pixel, Google Analytics, and DoubleClick, Jones also said Skullcandy installed Facebook’s Conversions ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.