The
The US District Court for the Southern District of New York cited the “suspiciousness” of the timing of Scotiabank’s move to end its relationship with the worker in rejecting the bank’s motion to dismiss his claims under the New York State Human Rights Law, the New York City Human Rights Law.
The bank argued that Michael Shaughnessy couldn’t sue under those laws because he was working ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.